Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bosses"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Darpey|Darpey]] ([[User talk:Darpey|talk]]) 21:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Darpey|Darpey]] ([[User talk:Darpey|talk]]) 21:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | Before I change all these "bosses" to link to this page, is it more proper to call the non-zone-boss mobs "bosses" - Or should I call them "named" ( | + | Before I change all these "bosses" to link to this page, is it more proper to call the non-zone-boss mobs "bosses" - Or should I call them "named" (i.e. "Dragon Slave" is a boss, but "The Warlord" is only a named...) and link to the boss page. I realize it's not a terribly important difference, but I'd prefer to get the semantics correct before spending an hour doing it. Or you think just call them all bosses? |
--[[User:Darpey|Darpey]] ([[User talk:Darpey|talk]]) 21:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Darpey|Darpey]] ([[User talk:Darpey|talk]]) 21:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 23 October 2015
Finished it quickly, I haven't added links to the page yet in other pages (where pages reference "boss")
Also most bosses I left as "normal" for the Special column, which is inaccurate for some.
Feel free to fix :)
I feel like this could be an interesting page to have :/
--Darpey (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Changed Kruciel's updates to simplify wording on "special" column and added breaks (to make column smaller)
--Darpey (talk) 21:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Before I change all these "bosses" to link to this page, is it more proper to call the non-zone-boss mobs "bosses" - Or should I call them "named" (i.e. "Dragon Slave" is a boss, but "The Warlord" is only a named...) and link to the boss page. I realize it's not a terribly important difference, but I'd prefer to get the semantics correct before spending an hour doing it. Or you think just call them all bosses?
